|
 |
 |
Saudi Arabia and the U.S. :
Deploying the Forces of Understanding
By Alan Llavore
Spring 2004
While many Americans have focused their attention on Saudi
Arabia since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the kingdom’s
relations with the United States go back several decades and far beyond
oil. It seemed fitting, then, that a university campus was the site for
a conference where the goal was to open a dialogue and foster understanding
at a personal level between two countries.
“I think it’s important to recognize that
we held this conference in an academic setting,” said John Conley,
dean of CSUSB’s College of Social and Behavioral Sciences, which
organized the conference in collaboration with King Saud University. “The
reason is that it provides an opportunity for open and reasoned discussion,
with a critical eye on these important international issues.”
Cal State welcomed a delegation of 19 educators and dignitaries
from King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, and the Ministry of Higher
Education Jan. 21-23. Conference attendees also included educators, administrators
and students from CSUSB and other educational institutions for a joint
conference, “United States-Saudi Arabian Relations in Light of the
Current International Crisis.”
CSUSB President Albert Karnig described relations between
Saudi Arabia and the United States as being at “dangerous crossroads.”
“On the one hand, the U.S. and Saudi Arabia have had a close and
strong relationship for 70 years – and we remain key allies to one
another,” Karnig said. “Conversely, a crisis of confidence
hangs over the Saudi-American relationship. In the West, there have been
allegations of Saudi government complicity in the events of 9-11, of at
least tacit indifference to how Saudi funds have financed terrorism. And
there’s a clear American perception that the Saudi government, until
perhaps recently, has been unwilling to identify terror cells in Saudi
Arabia.” Other issues that play into Americans’ perceptions
include women’s rights and extremist views offered in Saudi schools.
He also discussed Saudi perceptions of America. Karnig
referenced a 2003 nationwide survey by U.S. polling firm Zogby, which
showed that 90 percent of Saudis reject terrorist leader Osama Bin Laden’s
operations and believe his tactics are inconsistent with the values of
Islam. They also agree that the Sept. 11 attack was wrong, and say they
have no quarrel with the American public. Yet the Zogby survey also showed
that only “6 percent of Saudis have a favorable attitude toward
U.S. policies and actions in Iraq, and a scant 1 percent approve of U.S.
policy in Palestine,” Karnig said.
Though talk of terrorism, the Palestinian-Israeli conflict,
women’s rights, education reform and religious and cultural differences
could have sparked serious contention, reasoned discussion and deeper
understanding did take place during the panel presentations on Jan. 22,
the centerpiece event of the Saudi delegations’ visit, as well as
during other events. More than 900 students, faculty, staff and visitors
to the university participated in the panels and discussions.
Panelists reminded the audience that Saudi Arabia is a
relatively young country. The kingdom, as it is constituted now, was formed
in 1932. It is also the birthplace of Islam and is home to Islam’s
two holiest sites, Mecca and Medina. Its public education system was established
in the early 1950s, and only boys were allowed to attend school. It wasn’t
until 1960 that girls were allowed to attend formal classes.
Lost in the political debate portrayed in the American
news media, and therefore the minds of most Americans, is that the bond
between the two countries strengthened during the U.S. cold war with the
now-dismantled Soviet Union. The relationship was such that Saudi Arabia
and the U.S. had closer ties than the U.S. had with its European allies,
said Professor Othman Al-Rawaf, a member of the Saudi delegation and a
political scientist. It was a relationship that went beyond the concern
over the Soviet threat to the Middle East, he said. Also, Saudi Arabia
has been a strong moderate voice in the region, making it a leader in
the Arab world, able to be a force in forging joint agreements with its
neighboring states.
William Green, a political science professor at CSUSB,
said tensions between the two countries have developed and increased in
recent years as the U.S. military presence in the Arab region has grown,
especially with the war against Saddam Hussein’s regime in Iraq
in 2003. “We [Americans] have to understand that even if we intervene
in another country with the best motives,” said Green, “that
we are doing this for the best of everybody involved, people on the ground
in that region are not going to like us being there. Even if they understand
why we are there, they don’t like the fact that outsiders are coming
in to resolve their affairs.”
Sounding a similar caution in a later panel presentation
on culture, religion and society in Saudi Arabia was Dr. Selwa Al-Hazzaa,
an eye surgeon who heads the most prestigious ophthalmology hospital in
Riyadh and a fellow at Johns Hopkins Ophthalmology Center. If any change,
if any true reforms are to take place, she said, they have to come from
within Saudi society not from the outside.
Outside pressure, for example, should not be applied in
regard to women’s rights. It is wrong, she said, for people to expect
Saudi women to achieve the same level of independence in their home country
in a rapid fashion when it took generations for American women to do the
same. Cultural and religious matters must be considered. Outsiders either
don’t know of these or don’t value them, and Al-Hazzaa and
other Saudi panelists said their culture is very religious and very conservative
compared to the west.
“People will make the change,” she said. “But
it has to be our own change. It has to be within us that we have to make
the change, not some external force. If you force reform, it isn’t
reform anymore.”
The conference was a continuation of CSUSB’s activities
in the region initiated by political science professor Ralph Salmi and
fully supported by President Karnig, Dean Conley and Louis Fernandez,
university provost and vice president. It was the result of a relationship
developed and outlined in a memorandum of agreement signed June 2000 on
the CSUSB campus between Karnig, Saudi Arabia’s Minister of Higher
Education, Dr. Khalid Al-Angary, and King Saud University President Dr.
Abdullah Faisal.
Cal State San Bernardino has taken a leadership role within
the 23-campus California State University system with regards to academic
programs designed to increase understanding of the Middle East, including
one of the few programs offering Arabic languages.
In addition to its partnerships with King Saud University
and other universities in Saudi Arabia, CSUSB also has forged educational
partnerships and exchanges with universities in Turkey, including the
hosting of a symposium at Cal State San Bernardino in November 2003 with
Gazi University. More programs are being developed as a result of those
partnerships and the desire to forge better understanding between Americans
and other countries, Conley said.
“The communication and understanding that we talked
about all day long is a two-way street,” Conley said in closing
the Jan. 22 panel presentations. Referring to Americans, he said, “It
is as much our responsibility as it is the countries of the Middle East
to expand our curriculum, to develop student and faculty exchange programs
and to open our societies to cross-cultural communication.”
|
 |

 |
ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENT —
A King Saud University professor fields questions from CSUSB students
during a January conference on relations between his Saudi homeland
and America. Cal State's academic ties to Saudi Arabia were initiated
by political science Professor Ralph Salmi and fully supported by
CSUSB President Albert Karnig, John Conley, dean of social and behavioral
sciences, and Louis Fernandez, university provost and vice president. |
 |
|